Volume: | vmhs 084:019-028 |
Folios: | 29 |
Format: | 2:o |
Size: | 225x340 |
Gathering structure: | <12> + / + <2> |
Description: | No volume title, no original index. Gathering: One page seems to be missing between fol. 13 and 14, so that the gathering originally had been <13> + <2>; fol. 14r contains a fragment of an anonymous work, the beginning is missing. All tabulatures are written by GD's hand. Folio numbers in the lower right corner on the recto side added later by a librarian with red ink. On fol. 1r an index is added by a librarian, written with a black pen, library signatures added with red ink. Fol. 29v is empty, containing two horizontal lines only. |
Date1: | 1671-1672 |
Date ref: | fol. 10v, 13v, 18v, 22v, 26r |
Comments: | Date: Grusnick means that the date given on fol. 10v as "1672/ 20 febr:" was a mistake and should be 1671,the same as all the other dates in the volume (see Grusnick 1966: 140). It is to be considered that the now existing order of the volume might not be the original one; it seems likely the volume has been folded in a different way once (as one <15> issue). The last page of Geist's "Jesu delitium vultus ah" (fol. 13v) is not as usually notated across the 2:o fold; this implies that it once was the last page in the volume. This theory is confirmed by the fact that the following piece is incomplete and its beginning (!), which once might have been the first folio in the volume, is missing. Even the horizontal lines on the nowadays fol. 1r and 29v are pointing towards that assumption, as they are drawn in one continuous line at the same hight, in the same way as they are drawn in the previous piece (Sebastiani's "Omnes sumus debitores"), which indicates that they once were found on consecutive pages. Considering that the date 1672 after Pohle's "Domine ostende mihi" (given very distinctly as 20. February in 1672, by GD himself) is not necessarily to be seen as a mistake, being originally the last but one piece in the volume; it is more likely that the very last date, given as a badly written "1671" after Geist's "Jesu delitium vultus ah" might be incorrect. Intending not to complicate things too much all the folio numbers given in this database are following the ones that were added by librarians in the 19th century. The original order is yet to be seen as following: 1. Anonymous, fragment (orig. fol. 1r-2r) 2. Legrenzi, Magnificat (orig. fol. 1v-4r) 3. Ruggiero, Ego sum panis vitae (orig. fol. 3v-5r) 4. Pfleger, Justorum animae (orig. fol. 4v-6r) 5. Anon., Laudate Dominum (orig. fol. 6v-7r) 6. Capricornus, Bonum est confiteri (orig. fol. 7v-8r, incomplete) 7. Albrici, O cor meum (orig. fol. 8v-10r) 8. Geist, O immensa bonitas (orig. fol. 10v-13r) 9. Sebastiani, Omnes sumus debitores (orig. fol. 12v-16r) 10. Geist, Domine salvum fac Regem (orig. fol. 17v-23v) 11. Pohle, Domine ostende mihi (orig. fol. 23v-27r) 12. Geist, Jesu delitium vultus ah! (orig. fol. 26v-29v) |
Sources in volume: | |
Geist: | Domine qui das salutem (f. 1v-7v) |
Pohle: | Domine ostende mihi quaeso gloriam tuam (f. 7v-11r) |
Geist: | Jesu delitium vultus ah! (f. 10v-13v) |
Anonymous: | [work] (f. 14r-15r) |
Legrenzi: | Magnificat (f. 14v-17r) |
Ruggieri: | Ego sum panis vitae (f. 16v-18r) |
Pfleger: | Justorum animae in manu Dei sunt (f. 17v-19r) |
Anonymous: | Laudate Dominum omnes gentes (f. 19v-20r) |
Anonymous: | Bonum est confiteri Domino (f. 20v-21r) |
Albrici: | O cor meum quo vagaris (f. 21v-23r) |
Geist: | O immensa bonitas (f. 23v-26r) |
Sebastiani: | Omnes sumus debitores et iniquitates (f. 25v-29r) |
Watermarks in volume: | |
wmnr | Wm_name | Variant | Watref | Cmark | Comment |
---|
644 | Arms of Sweden | Arms of Sweden | Rudén 1968: 195 | Horn | This paper was most likely produced in the paper manufactury of Klippan (Kristianstad county) in Sweden (Rudén 1968: 195). |